ARGUMENT FROM MORALITY

ARGUMENT FROM MORALITY - Intro to Philosophy / Prof....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Intro to Philosophy / Prof. Pruim’s Notes /      Euthyphro and the Argument from Morality / p.      1    THE ARGUMENT FROM MORALITY TO THE EXISTENCE OF GOD, AND SOCRATES’ CRITICISMS AS FOUND IN EUTHYPHRO Introduction. The key idea of this argument is to use morality as evidence for the existence of God. That is, the argument begins with the premise that at least some things are morally right, and others morally wrong (e.g., murder in the first degree, race prejudice, etc,). The argument then uses this as evidence that God exists, for, it is claimed, only God could be the source of laws of morality. I. The Argument. Here is a more formal presentation of the argument from morality to the existence of God. Three premises are used for the conclusion that a divine lawgiver exists: Premise 1. There are laws of morality. That is, there are facts about what is morally right and morally wrong. (Just with facts about nature, it is not always easy to discover them; nevertheless we know some. E.g., it is wrong to go kill people just to get a thrill out of it.) Premise 2. Morality is significantly different from legality, because legality is simply the product of human decision-making, while morality is not the product of human decision- making. (ELABORATION: Legality, i.e., what is allowed by law, is nothing more than the product of human decision-making; it is the product of human will. What is not legal can be made legal simply by passing a new law, i.e., simply by changing our minds about whether we wish to allow it. Hence, e.g., gambling or slavery can be made legal . Morality is different. Morality is not simply the collective will of people, for, the collective will of the people can sometimes be immoral. (This was certainly the case in the US in the eighteenth century when the majority wished to hold blacks and indebted individuals in slavery.) What is immoral can not be made moral by simply changing our minds about it, by choosing to allow it, by voting for a new law. E.g., slavery can not be made moral simply by the majority or the authorities deciding (voting) that it shall be regarded as acceptable. The enslaving of all short people can not be made moral simply by the tall people's taking a “pro-attitude” toward it.) Premise 3. But, moral laws are someone or something’s decisions and commands; for they are orders, and orders are given by something that has a mind and a will and makes decisions. So, moral laws are the commands from some authority, but one that has an authority greater than any collection of humans. Conclusion: Therefore, there does exist some being with a mind and will, which can issue commands, and which has an authority greater than any state or society, an authority so great that whatever it commands is our moral duty to obey. (And so God exists, for the being described in this conclusion would be a god.)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Intro to Philosophy / Prof. Pruim’s Notes /      Euthyphro and the Argument from Morality / p. 
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/10/2008 for the course PHIL 110 taught by Professor Pruim during the Spring '08 term at E. Stroudsburg.

Page1 / 6

ARGUMENT FROM MORALITY - Intro to Philosophy / Prof....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online