Based on such core themes a common interview schedule

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: nvestment decision-making process; and fourthly, respondents’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the process. Based on such core themes, a common interview schedule (Appendix 1) was developed. The initial questions focused on relatively broad conceptual issues, progressing to specific practical issues during the course of the interview, with the aim of producing rich and detailed accounts of the participants’ perceptions of the investment decision-making process. BP volunteered to pilot the interview schedule and the researcher visited them several times in April 1998 to conduct interviews. The researcher was unfamiliar with interviewing. Taping the interviews permitted reflection later on the researcher’s ability and role as an interviewer. The interviews were transcribed and these transcripts played a valuable role indicating those terms and processes the researcher was using which were academically understood but which required clarification at practitioner level. The interview schedule was amended accordingly with some questions being rephrased, others discarded and several new questions being added. These interviews were used to improve the researcher’s technique as an interviewer rather than for data collection. After the modification of the interview schedule, the transcripts from these interviews were discarded. The researcher then had to decide whom to approach in each of the companies and how best to approach them. Ideally, the researcher wanted to speak to individuals who were actively involved in the whole investment appraisal process. With this rationale, it was decided to approach each operator’s Exploration Manager, or equivalent, using the membership list of the Petroleum Exploration Society of Great Britain. Initially the project was outlined in a letter that indicated what would be required of each participant company, detailing what would be done with the collected data and giving assurances of confidentiality and anonymity. This was then followed up with either an e-mail or telephone call. 62 The letters were sent in March 1998 and the researcher began receiving responses in early April. The number of positive responses was overwhelming. Twenty-seven of the thirty-one companies approached agreed to participate – a response rate of 87%. This high response rate is clearly a function of timing and subject. As indicated in Chapter 3, the increasingly dynamic and complex operating environment of upstream had increased the pressure on petroleum companies to manage their investment decision-making processes better and decision analysis techniques were beginning to receive increasing attention in the industry literature (for example, Ball and Savage, 1999; Galli et al., 1999; Watson, 1998; Schuyler, 1997; Murtha, 1997; Nangea and Hunt, 1997; Otis and Schneiderman, 1997; Newendorp, 1996). During the interviews, many of the respondents reported that their organisations were currently in the process of reviewing their investment decision-m...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online