However currently there is no single piece of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: racterised by high risk and uncertainty and have a high initial investment without the prospect of revenues for a significant period. Commercially available software packages can be used to assist the decision-maker with some of these steps. For example, Merak produces various tools such as Decision Tree™, Portfolio™ and PEEP™ (Petroleum Economic Evaluation Package) which uses Crystal Ball™ to perform Monte Carlo analysis. DNV (Det Norske Veritas) have developed a software tool, Easy Risk™, for preference theory analysis. However, currently there is no single piece of software that allows the upstream decision-maker to utilise all the tools in their toolkit. Through recently established collaborative relationships, the major players (CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) Australia, Merak, Gaffney, Cline & Associates, 124 Wood Mackenzie and DNV) are now working together in an attempt to deliver to the upstream investment decision-maker the definitive software tool. 5.8 CONCLUSION This chapter has answered the first research question posed in Chapter 1 by presenting the spectrum of techniques available to the industry for investment decision-making. This is not intended to be a comprehensive study of the mathematics governing and underpinning each technique. This is widely documented elsewhere. The aim here was only to give an overview of the methods and indicate current theoretical capability. Recent studies suggest that current practice is some way behind this potential. However, this research has been limited and it is apparent there is a need for a study that establishes common practice in upstream investment appraisal. The following chapter addresses this issue. 125 Chapter Six Current practice in investment appraisal in the upstream oil and gas industry 126 6.1 INTRODUCTION There has been much research published on decision-making (for example, Ford, 2000; Gunn; 2000; Ekenberg, 2000; Markides, 1999; Harrison and Pelleteir, 2000; Milne and Chan; 1999; Nutt, 1999; Burke and Miller, 1999; Papadakis, 1998; Dean and Sharfman, 1996; Quinn, 1980; Mintzberg et al., 1976; Cyert and March, 1963). The numerous qualitative studies that have been conducted are useful for providing broad insights into the field of decision-making. However, very few of these studies have examined the use of decision analysis in investment decision-making. Several have focussed on the existence of formalisation and rationality in decision-making (for example, Papadakis, 1998; Dean and Sharfman, 1996) but few have explicitly examined the use, and usefulness, of decision analysis in investment appraisal decision-making. Fewer again have considered cases where the decision situation is characterised by a substantial initial investment, high (absolute) risk and uncertainty throughout the life of the asset and a long payback period, features that are common in, though not unique to, the petroleum industry. Typically, where such research has been undert...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/30/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online