N2 137 as such some respondents reported that while

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ese tools in the upstream are particularly interesting. • Portfolio theory Awareness of portfolio theory in the upstream is low and its usage is even lower. Only three of the organisations interviewed fully endorse the use of portfolio theory. However, most companies had an intuitive grasp on its fundamental principles. This is well illustrated by this quote where the interviewee unwittingly describes the difference between diversifiable and non-diversifiable risk: “Portfolio Theory … Do we do that? Not as such. To a certain extent. I mean one of the things at the moment is with the oil price being so low and gas prices perhaps still holding up there’s a shift from oil to gas in the portfolio. So on that level yes. Do we look at individual projects and say, “umm that’s risky, better have a safe one?” No. I would say not. You can get rid of some of the risks but ones like oil price, exchange rate much less likely to be able to mitigate those.” (N2) 137 As such, some respondents reported that while prospects are not analysed according to the rigors of portfolio theory, before drilling a prospect, it is “screened” to see if it fits with various organisational criteria. For example, some companies will only operate in areas where there is low political risk whereas others prefer only to explore where they know they will be the only operators. The following two quotes are indicative of current practice: “The starting point, if you like, is that we have identified and review periodically, so-called core areas in particular core countries. There are certain areas of the world, for the sake of argument, South East Asia which we have elected to not invest ourselves in because we are fully occupied elsewhere and we think get better returns elsewhere. If we want to enter a new country one of our responsibilities in [the] commercial [department] is to maintain what we call country evaluations. So within our areas of interest, we keep more or less current evaluations of countries from the point of view of political, economic stability, working environment etc. So the first point of call if the explorationist want to go for the sake of argument Ethiopia, then we would need to consider the overall climate in the country and the technical prospectivity and combining those two we then put a broad brush proposal to our Chief Executive. And this is going into a new country because he has to sign off on any venture of that sort.” (P), and, “We at this moment, I can only speak for what we are doing here in the U.K., there has been a sort of strategic decision made beforehand about where we should operate and how we should operate and so within that framework is where we are now currently working. That’s mainly in the southern gas base. So that is where we stand. So yes. There are strategic decisions and we sort of try to test the waters every now and then to see what head office feels about us going into certain directions.” (G) In the literature, some authors (Simpson et al., 2000) argue that portfolio theory is particularly applicable to small companies...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/30/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online