# The holders payoff is that sum minus the price paid

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 9). An option to buy is known as a call option and is usually purchased in the expectation that the price of the stock will rise. Thus a call option may allow its holder to buy a share in company ABC for \$500 on or before June 2001. If the price of the stock rises above \$500 the holder of the option can exercise it (pay \$500) and retain the difference. The holder’s payoff is that sum minus the price paid for the option. A put option is bought in the expectation of a falling price and protects against such a fall. The exercise price is the price at which the option can be exercised (in this case \$500) (Bailey et al., in press). The central problem with options is working out how much the owner of the contract should pay at the outset. Basically, the price is equivalent to an insurance premium; it is the expected loss that the writer of the contract will sustain. Clearly, the ability to exercise the option at any time up to the maturity date makes American options more valuable than European options. What is less obvious is that this apparently minor difference necessitates different procedures for calculating option prices (Galli et al., 1999). 112 The standard assumption made in option theory is that prices follow lognormal Brownian motion. Black and Scholes developed the model in the early 1970s. Experimental studies have shown that it is a good approximation of the behaviour of prices over short periods of time. If they obey the standard Black-Scholes model, then the spot price, psp, satisfies the partial differential equation: d psp = σpWt + µ pspdt where psp=spot price, Wt=Brownian motion, µ=drift in spot prices, p=price and σ=spot price volatility. Applying Ito’s Lemma, the explicit formula for psp can be shown to be: µ - σ2)/2] t +σWt} psp = p0e{[( where psp=spot price, Wt=Brownian motion, µ=drift in spot prices, and σ=spot price volatility, p0=oil price, t=time It is relatively easy to evaluate European options (which can be exercised only on a specified date), particularly when the prices follow Black-Scholes model because there is an analytic solution to the corresponding differential equation. This gives the expected value of max[p exp (-rt) – p k, 0] for a call or of max[p k – p exp(-rt),0] for a put. In general the simplest way of getting the histogram and the expected value is by simulating the diffusion process and comparing each of the terminal values to the strike price of the option. Solving the partial differential equation numerically gives only the option price (Galli et al., 1999). Evaluating the price of an American option is more difficult because the option can be exercised at any time up to the maturity date. From the point of view of stochastic differential equations, this corresponds to a free-boundary problem (see Wilmot, Dewynne and Howison, 1994). The most common way of solving this type of 113 problem is by constructing a binomial tree. This is similar to a decision tree (for an explanation see Galli et al., 1999). In the formula for NPV given in section 5.2, the discount rate was used to account for...
View Full Document

## This document was uploaded on 03/30/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online