Cartesian Skepticism: Descartes' Meditation I

Cartesian Skepticism: Descartes' Meditation I -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction to Philosophy / Prof. Pruim’s Notes     Cartesian Skepticism / p. 1 IS THERE ANY DOUBT ABOUT WHAT MY SENSES TELL ME? Notes on Meditation I and II of Rene Descartes (1596-1650) I. The Issue: does my sense experience give me knowledge? My perceptual experience obviously causes me to form certain beliefs. E.g., my current experience causes me to believe there is a brown, flat, rectangular table in front of me. Does my belief in that case have the status of knowledge ? Do I know, on the basis of the observation, that there is such a table before me? II. Descartes’ Method of Doubt (for telling whether or not something is a piece of knowledge). THE METHOD IN GENERAL: Descartes maintains: I know only if it is not possible to have a reason to doubt my belief. That is, I know only if my evidence is conclusive. That is, I know only if my evidence makes it impossible for my belief to be false. APPLYING IT TO SENSE PERCEPTION: So, to find out whether perceptually generated beliefs count as knowledge, Descartes asks, “Is there any reason to doubt the beliefs which are caused by my sense experience?” “Is my experience of seeing a table conclusive evidence that a table is there?” “Does my experience of seeing a table mean that it is impossible for there to be no table there?” III. Descartes’ Arguments for Doubting the Senses. First Argument: Illusions . 1. Descartes points out that sometimes my senses have actually fooled me. They have caused me to adopt a false belief. I know that is so because sometimes my experiences clashed with each other, as in the illusion of a stick in water which looks bent but feels straight. The clash means that one of the beliefs is false (even if I can not yet know which one). 2. So, Descartes tries this argument: Sometimes my senses did fool me. So, every time my senses could be fooling me.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Introduction to Philosophy / Prof. Pruim’s Notes     Cartesian Skepticism / p. 2 3. Is it a good argument? Criticism : although the premise of the argument is true, it is not obvious that the conclusion validly follows --since it is about every experience. Why think that
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/10/2008 for the course PHIL 110 taught by Professor Pruim during the Spring '08 term at E. Stroudsburg.

Page1 / 4

Cartesian Skepticism: Descartes' Meditation I -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online