Unformatted text preview: ncerned, an angle of attack greater than 5 degrees yields unacceptable values for the pressure ratio as given by the linear theory, with a
percentage deviation of more than 5 percent.
Table2b
(deg) (rad) .( .( )/ ( )/ ) 5 15 30 Beyond an angle of attack of five degrees, the linear theory gives unphysical values for the pressure
coefficient over the upper surface of the airfoil. Up to an angle of attack of about five degrees, the
percentage deviation is reasonable.
PROBLEM 2a
The drag coefficient is given by
( )
√ Where k2 and k3 are contributions from the camber and thickness of an airfoil. In this problem, k2=0,
since both the airfoils have no camber. Symmetric diamond airfoil
The term k3 is evaluated using the formula,
∫( ̂
)
̂ ̂ ∫( ̂
)
̂ ̂ Where ̂ and ̂ are the y and x coordinates of the airfoil normalized by the chord length c. ̂ ( ̂ ) is the
thickness distribution which for a symmetric airfoil is the same as the upper surface coordinate ̂ ( ̂ ). For the symmetric diamond airfoil ()
̂ ̂ ̂ ̂
̂ ̂ Since the rear surface of the airfoil has the same magnitude of slope, but an opposite sense of
orientation with respect to the free stream,
̂
̂
∫( ̂
)
̂ ̂
̂ ∫ () ̂ ∫( ()
The drag coefficient is therefore
( )
√ ( )
√ Symmetric airfoil
The equation for the top surface of the airfoil is
( ) ( ̂) In terms of nondimensional coordinates
̂ ) ̂ ̂
̂
∫( ̂ ̂
)
̂ ̂ ∫( ̂
)
̂ ∫( ̂) ̂ ∫( ̂) ̂ ̂ ()
( )
√ ( )
√ PROBLEM 2b The drag coefficient for the symmetric diamond airfoil (
) is smaller than that for
the symmetric curved airfoil (
). The lift coefficient for both the airfoils would be the same since the lift coefficient is determined
solely by the angle of attack and is independent of the camber and thickness...
View
Full
Document
 Spring '09
 COLLICOTT

Click to edit the document details