{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Today the eus court of justice ruled that dierent

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: hat the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits different treatment of insured persons on the basis of their sex in connection with pension funds. Today, the EU’s Court of Justice ruled that different insurance premiums for women and men constitute sex discrimination and are not compatible with the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights. Member States are not allowed to derogate from this important principle in their national legislation. The relevant “opt out” clause in the Council’s 2004 Directive on gender equality is thus illegal. [. . .]” EU press release, MEMO/11/123 Event Date: 01/03/2011 [link] 16/20 This has consequences.. See [link] or [link] Actuarial Statistics – Module 4b: Ethical perspectives Moral judgement: Possible frameworks Central questions 1 Introduction - Ethics Some elements of definition The process 2 Moral awareness in context: Actuarial applications Discrimination in insurance Heterogeneity in insurance Heterogeneity - Illustrations Discrimination - Illustrations 3 Moral judgement: Possible frameworks Central questions Utilitarianism Deontology A. Asher’s framework 17/20 Actuarial Statistics – Module 4b:...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online