{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Mastery learning however also has its critics for

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: nts on before they 15 are ready, helps teachers focus on important objectives, and provides a structure for identifying and assisting students who need help. Mastery learning, however, also has its critics. For example, Slavin’s (1989) review of mastery learning provides a much less positive picture of its effectiveness. His synthesis of research on mastery learning suggests that effectiveness can vary depending on the age of the students, length and type of mastery learning, and the way that researchers measure achievement. Teachers have also expressed the concern that mastery learning is too much of a sequential view of learning, and may be less suitable for courses with non-sequential content (Postlewaithe & Haggerty, 1998). Given the issues with mastery learning, you need to consider carefully when to use this strategy. You could, for example, identify critical foundational objectives in your curricula, and use mastery learning approaches primarily for those objectives. Educational Technology and Behavioral Approaches Behavioral psychologists, especially B. F. Skinner, were among the first see the potential of educational technology. This interest in the use of technology to support...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online