Reward systems in classrooms are a technique for

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: issues with the use of reinforcement systems in classrooms, and the issues with behavioral approaches to instruction. 40 The Debate Over the Use of Reinforcement Systems in Classrooms Recently, Alfie Kohn (1993a; 1993b; 1995) has become one of the more outspoken critics of the use of behavioral techniques such as reinforcement in classrooms, and his criticisms include the following. • Reward systems in classrooms are a technique for controlling students. These systems do not allow students to develop the skills to selfcontrol and problem-solve. • Reward systems are ineffective. Once the rewards stop, students revert to the earlier misbehaviors. They do not lead to permanent changes in behavior. • Reward systems may decrease students’ intrinsic motivation for academic tasks. This contention is based on a series of studies that suggest that when students are reinforced for activities they already find enjoyable, their interest in those activities can decrease (Lepper, 1983; Lepper & Greene, 1978). As you might expect, there have been responses to these types of criticisms. First, behaviorists going all the way back to J. B. Watson and B. F. Skinner have suggested that environmental control is a natural part of the world (See for example, Skinner, 1953). The issue is not whether environments exert control, but how that control might be used to help individuals. Also, as we will 41 discuss in Chapter 4, learners can be taught to use behavioral techniques to selfregulate their own behavior. Second, behaviorists would challenge the idea that reinforcement systems are ineffective, because this challenge fails to consider their functional definition for reinforcement (Maag, 1999). As you remember from earlier in the chapter, reinforcement is defined in terms of its effect. If you went to a behavioral psychologist and said that you had tried reinforcement and it didn’t work, she would most likely respond by saying, “I don’t know what you did, but it wasn’t reinforcement. Reinforcement by definition increases the likelihood of the behavior.” From a behavioral perspective, it would be more accurate to say that your attempt at reinforcement failed. Although this may seem like a matter of semantics, behaviorists would be quick to point out that poor applications of any idea are likely not to be effective. It should be noted, that well-designed behavioral interventions have generally been to found to be effective interventions, especially for students with disabilities (Lloyd, Forness, & Kavale. 1998; Maag, 2001). Given the inclusion movement in this country, this is a significant finding. The criticism that the effects of reinforcement systems do not maintain once the reinforcement program has terminated is one criticism that has been generally supported by research on behavioral interventions, specifically when these programs are used to modify problematic behaviors (Kazdin, 1977). 42 Behaviors can and often do extinguish once reinforcement is withdrawn (Alberto & Troutman, 1999). Additionally, the effects do not seem to easily transfer beyond the original settings wher...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/29/2014 for the course EPS 324 at N. Arizona.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online