asam20--lec3 - Lecture #3 Differing Circumstances of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lecture #3 Differing Circumstances of immigration The last lecture focused on the very different circumstance surrounding the immigration to the US of different Asian groups. We will continue today to discuss Asian Indian immigration. Prior to that discussion lets pay attention to look at these differing circumstances surrounding immigration. Specifically, five areas will be the focus to outline these differences. 1. The relationship of the home country to Western expansionism (China and Britain and the Opium wars, Japan and Commodore Perry and the Meiji restoration, etc. 2. The existing traditions or legacy of migration (in China especially in Guangdong province, in Japan with the Dekasegin tradition in the SW provinces, in the Philippines with the Ilocos region 3. The internal context of the homeland(the Opium wars, the Taiping Rebellion and the Red Turban Revolt in China, the Meiji Restoration of Japan, in Korea, the annexation of Korea by Japan. 4. The US demand for labor at the time(sometimes a greater demand in Hawaii, sometimes in California and the west coast. 5. Mechanisms for immigration (Japan: the Irwin convention, for Korea: Horace Allen and other missionaries; for the Philippines, the HSPA. PUSH FACTORS AND PULL FACTORS Immigration is influenced by two kinds of factors, those leading to an exodus from the homeland and those enticing people to come to a particular place. (For example, why did Filipinos come to the US, or why are certain kinds and classes of people from Korea coming to the US right now?) The worldwide disruption of communities and countries that happened as a result of Western imperialism was directly related to the industrial revolution in the Western countries that then drew people especially to the US for the work opportunities. The push and pull factors of Asian immigration to the US are in a dialectical relationship to each, the roots of both intertwined in Western expansionism> "WE ARE HERE BECAUSE YOU WERE THERE." SIKH(Asian Indian Immigration) Britain began plundering Indian in the 18th century. In traditional colonizing fashion, Britain took India's precious metals and raw material and flooded India with British manufactured goods, displacing Indian manufacturing. As in other colonial relationships, India's underdevelopment began with the British conquest--before that England and India were not so different
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
economically. The "development" that Indian underwent while under British rule was for Britain and not for India.( A similar example is Korea under Japanese rule, the argument is often given that it was good for Korea, for Japan built railroads. The railroads did not link Korean villages, though; they were solely to get Korean raw materials to port, and didn't help Korean development. Most Asian Indian immigrants to North America were from the Punjab Sikh region of NW India. This area was annexed by
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/10/2008 for the course AS AM 1 taught by Professor Zhao during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 12

asam20--lec3 - Lecture #3 Differing Circumstances of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online