sg_chpt4

Sg_chpt4

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: that if families were helped to see new ways of understanding their problems, they would find better ways of organizing themselves, without a need for reference to norms. Symptoms simply functioned to preserve family homeostasis and were maintained by interactional sequences. The Original Milan Model The first model was strongly influenced by the MRI strategic methods. Families were seen by a male-female dyad and observed by other team members. Each session had five parts: 1. Presession - the team formed an initial hypothesis. 2. Session - the hypothesis was validated or modified. 3. Intersession – the team met alone to form an intervention. 4. Intervention - the therapists returned to deliver the intervention, either a positive connotation or a ritual (see below), which was given in the form of a statement together with a prohibition against change, using paradox to counter resistance to change. 5. Post session discussion - team analysis of the session and formulation of a plan for the next session (Nichols & Schwartz, 1998). The sessions were held one month apart to give families time to react to the interventions, and the total number of sessions was usually limited to ten. Two basic interventions, positive connotation and rituals characterized the early model. Positive Connotation. Positive Connotation is the hallmark of the early Milan systemic model. They believed that people could not easily change under the influence of negative connotation. For example, diagnostic labeling (a negative connotation) implies causality and implicates the person with the diagnosis. Positive connotation, by contrast, avoids linear causality and blame by assigning a positive motive or value to each family member’s behavior. Their initial intervention technique was similar to reframing (used by the MRI therapists) since the symptom was assumed to serve a protective function, and the goal of the intervention was to alter the way the symptom was viewed by the family. However, these therapists objected to the technique of reframing to the extent that family members feel blamed for creating problems in their families. Positive connotation “eliminated the implica...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 04/03/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online