Environmental+Toxicology+Tox+2000+notes (2)

3147 chronic tests 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h chronic tests

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: than 96 h. In practice they may have durations of 7 days to 60 Figure 35 days or for the life-span of the organism. Ecotoxicology LC50 as a function of time with has not yet attained the level of sophistication of continuous exposure mammalian toxicology where full life -span tests are routinely conducted in rodents. The most likely reason for this is the expense of maintaining environmentally appropriate organisms such as fish and the cost of treating the effluent from their tanks. Time From a pharmacokinetic point of view, the chronic test should have a duration of at least three half-lives in the organism. This would allow the compound to almost attain equilibrium in the organism and thus allow the expression of responses at the highest body dose likely to be attained. Lifetime tests are designed to test for delayed toxic effects such as reproductive problems, developmental abnormalities, and cancer. 3.1.5 Selectivity Selectivity of toxic action is very important in a ssessing the effects of toxic substances in the environment. Selectivity is well illustrated in the case of pesticides, which are designed to protect some organisms while controlling others. ―Selective pesticides‖ has long been the cry of the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) special ist, the environmentalist, and of the general public. It is perhaps relevant to first define selectivity in the context of this discussion. Selectivity can be defined as an increase in toxicity towards one organism (the pe st in the case of pesticides), combined with a reduction in hazard to the user and/or the organisms being protected. This type of selectivity is the first aim of all drug and pesticide develop ment and manufacture and often is achieved as the result of t he specific receptor systems found only in the pest organism. An example of this is seen in the selectivity of the herbicide glyphosate for plants, which possess the target enzyme ( See Chapter 1, Section 1.7.8 ) Receptor -mediated modes of toxicity usually result in greater toxicity to organisms that possess the receptor system and smaller, background, toxicity as a result of their physical or narcotic actions ( Lipnick 1993) in non-receptor organism (Figure 3-14). Narcotic Narcotic Response Receptor-mediated Concentration Selective toxicity towards a class or group of pests is an obvious ad vantage in selective control and is a characteristic of many fungicides and herbicides where the non target organisms are also in the same class as the pests. With insects, it is obvious that the insecticide must not harm the plants to be protected; but it is also an advantage for integrated pest management if the insecticide is not toxic to beneficial insects (bees) and other useful, or important, organisms. Figure 3-146 Illustration of differences in sensitivity between organisms with and those without the receptor system The disadvantages of too great a selectivity towards certain pests are mostly economic — too small a market may be available to support development costs. This is especially relevant today with the in creasing complexity and expense of toxicology in supp...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 04/07/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online