Environmental+Toxicology+Tox+2000+notes (2)

This may make them more susceptible to the effects of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: hus indicate more accurately those groups of organisms which may be affected under actual use conditions. It is also possible that or ganisms may be less susceptible under field conditions than in the labora tory because of double jeopardy factors existing in the field but not in the laboratory. Recovery of a group o f organisms and particularly the time taken for this after a toxic insult is also useful information from a regulatory point of view and can only be observed in the field or under field conditions. 3.2.8.1.2 Structure, diversity, and function Effects noted in numbers of organisms (structure) may also be reflected in measurements of their diversity and in the function of the ecosystem. These effects will usually be observed in a strict hierarchy, that is, changes in numbers must precede changes in diversity and these usually precede changes in function. Ecosystem function, which is usually expressed in terms of productivity, for example, photosynthesis, is strongly conserved in the face of a toxic insult because of redundancy built into most ecosystem functions. However, a long -term change in diver sity may have indirect effects, such as those caused by the re placement of one type of food organism by another. While most preda tor or herbivore organisms would not be affected under these condi tions, others may have specific food requirements and feel the impact. 3.2.8.1.3 Ecosystem productivity Ecosystem productivity in water is usually measured in terms of photosynthesis or the ratio of photosynthesis to respiration. Because this is an integrative measurement, it is subject to a lack of sensitivity result ing from redundancy and homeo static mechanisms in the system. 3.2.8.1.4 Assessment of impact In terms of impact assessment, studies in enclosures and microcosms have allowed the demonstration of statistically significant differences between single spe cies or taxa in a set of treated systems compared to a set of untreated reference systems. These differ ences are more obvious for those compounds which act rapidly, cause acute toxicity and diminish as numbers of the target species recover to levels comparable to refer ence systems (). Differences at the community level are less obvious and more difficult to d emonstrate as one moves from individ ual species to larger and larger taxa. One species will often increase in numbers while another, susceptible to the substance in question, will de crease. If one ascends further up the scale of generalization to the l evel of the ecosystem, it again becomes more and more difficult to demonstrate changes due to the action of a toxicant. Gross community parameters such as pro ductivity are the most insensitive to perturbation. In limnocorral enclosures, significant cha nges in phytoplankton species appear to have less overall effect on production or photosynthesis. Similarly, the zooplankton dependent on these primary pro ducers seem to be able to adjust their diet and, for the most part, do not...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online