Inserting into the 3rd first order condition we have

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Inserting into the 3rd first-order condition, we have . . → . Because F=H, H= 1259.9. This is shown as the point (1259.9, 1259.9) on indifference curve with U = 1259.9 in Figure 1. B6) Demonstrate that this matches the utility in Des Moines. Plugging these optimum values into the utility function, we have , . . . which is the level in Des Moines. B7) The income level will be 47% of the salary in San Francisco. How does that salary compare to the average salary for economists in San Francisco? Why might the salary in San Francisco not fully compensate for the utility loss from higher home prices? The level of expenditure necessary to get utility in San Francisco up to the level in Des ∙ . ∙ . $, . Since this is 47% of Moines is the total salary, the San Franciso salary for economists would be $160,838. The actual salary for economists averages $127,000. That suggests that economists are willing to sacrifice utility from food and housing in order to live in San Francisco. If San Francisco offers other amenities above and beyond those offered by Des Moines (cultural attractions, location, scenery, proximity to recreational areas), workers are willing to ‘pay’ for those amenit...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online