Case16577460154069 688056hlenassdt2asvis1oischolarr

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: d that since Blackmon offered the nickname without expectation of compensation, Iverson wasn’t unjustly enriched by profiting from the marketing of “The Answer.” A promise to provide something in return for what another person has already done for you is not consideration for a contractual obligation. Contract promises are exchanges about future performance by both sides, not thank-you promises for benefits already received. Source: Blackmon v. Iverson, 324 F. Supp. 2d 602 (E.D. Pa. 2003) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16577460154069 688056&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr Preexisting Duty It is not consideration to do what one is already obligated to do. For example: Example 4.27. Mara, a police officer, gives information that leads to the arrest of a bank robber. Mara attempts to claim the $10,000 reward the bank has offered. rog80328_04_c04_062-088.indd 80 10/26/12 5:42 PM Section 4.4 Consideration CHAPTER 4 Example 4.28. Al, a company’s accountant, agrees to recheck the company’s tax returns in exchange for a percentage of the tax savings he can realize for the company. Neither Mara nor Al has given consideration to make a contract. They are already obligated to perform the duties for which they seek additional compensation: the police officer has a duty to the public to catch criminals, and the accountant has a preexisting duty to find the largest legal refund he can for his employer. Mara and Al are not giving anything new or different than they are already required to give. Suppose Cathy contracts to build a house for Rita for $100,000. Halfway through the project, Cathy decides she isn’t going to make enough profit and she refuses to finish unless Rita promises to pay her an additional $15,000. Rita, facing a half-done house, reluctantly agrees. Cathy finishes the house. Must Rita pay her? Generally the answer is no, because Cathy gave no new consideration. But if in exchange for Rita’s promise, Cathy in turn promises to install a beautiful door knocker (worth an entire $25) that was not in the contract, that is consideration and Rita is bou...
View Full Document

This test prep was uploaded on 04/09/2014 for the course BUS 311 taught by Professor Parker during the Spring '10 term at Ashford University.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online