BUS311_chapter_05

Continued rog8032805c05089 110indd 107 102612 537

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: , the geographic scope, the largest toy company, in 1997 for breach of contract. schedule for payment, and the percentage royalty. Reed Saxon/Associated Press Mattel asked Lamle to “draft a formal document memorializing” this agreement and “promised [that] it would sign a formal, written contract before January 1, 1998” (Pl.App. at 59). Mattel employee Mike Bucher subsequently sent Lamle an e-mail entitled “Farook Deal” on June 26 that substantially repeated the terms agreed to at the June 11 meeting. The salutation “Best regards Mike Bucher” appeared at the end of the e-mail. On August 13, Mattel sent Lamle a fax indicating it was waiting for the written document. Lamle sent the requested written contract on August 19. However, Mattel decided it did not want to license Farook after all. Lamle sued for breach of contract. Issue: Did the contract fall within the California statute of frauds? If so, can the writing requirement be satisfied by the Bucher e-mail? Discussion: The court emphasized that it was not deciding whether t...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online