This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: udy pub- trations of the six constituents. The loading conditions and lished by von Sperling & Oliveira (). separation into groups were those used for BOD (Table 1
– under, usual and overloaded groups in terms of speciﬁc Primary facultative ponds parameters; Table 2 – groups 1 and 2 in terms of both
ﬂow-rate and MI). The ﬁnal results of the statistical tests Figure 5 presents the relationship between efﬂuent BOD con- are summarized in Tables 7 and 8, which present only centration and BOD removal efﬁciency and the following 46 S. C. Oliveira & M. von Sperling Figure 4 | | Performance of wastewater treatment technologies Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development | 01.1 | 2011 Comparison between mean removal efﬁciencies and expected values according to the literature. variables: surface loading rate (Ls), hydraulic retention time in terms of BOD and COD, but also in terms of nitrogen and (HRT), inﬂuent ﬂow and monitoring index (MI). The loading coliforms: organic loading inﬂuences dissolved oxygen con- conditions (under, usual or overload) for each pond, operating centrations and pH levels in the ponds, which are directly as a primary facultative, are also shown in the ﬁgure. linked to the main N and FC removal mechanisms. The stat- It is seen that, as expected, when the ponds operated under istical tests indicated that the ﬂow (indicator of plant relative overloading conditions (high Ls or low HRT), there was a ten- size) and monitoring index (possible surrogate for operational dency to an increased efﬂuent BOD concentration, with involvement) had little inﬂuence on the efﬂuent concen- results conﬁrmed by the statistical tests (Table 7). However, trations, but more inﬂuence on removal efﬁciencies. in some cases very high loading rate values did not seem to
have caused a signiﬁcant deterioration in the efﬂuent quality. Secondary facultative pond The concentration values were, in general, above the expected
ranges reported in the literature. BOD removal efﬁciencies Figure 6 presents the plots of Ls, HRT, inﬂuent ﬂow and MI were not signiﬁcantly inﬂuenced by the loading conditions. for the secondary facultative ponds, and the results show The mean and median efﬂuent concentrations of BOD, that the applied surface organic rate and resulting HRT COD, TN and FC from those ponds operating at organic over- did not inﬂuence substantially the performance of the sec- loading were signiﬁcantly higher than those operating at usual ondary FPs. Differently from what could be expected, or underloading conditions. This is a coherent result, not only there were cases of very poor efﬂuent quality with 47 S. C. Oliveira & M. von Sperling | Performance of wastewater treatment technologies Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development | 01.1 | 2011 underloading conditions and also good efﬂuent quality with were no statistically signiﬁcant differences in terms of Lv, overloading conditions. Although the poor performance of considering all constituents analysed. Most of the ponds some overloaded ponds seemed to have been inﬂuenced operated under hydraulic underload, that is, with hydraulic by this condition, there were cases of ponds operating retention times longer than the usual, an...
View Full Document
- Spring '14