For this i you may attack the argument by developing

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: of soundness depends on the truth of its premises. Thus part (III) should be the main part of your discussion. For this: (i) You may attack the argument by developing an attack against one of the premises and saying how the attack survives replies. Or (ii) you may defend by developing a reply against some one particular attack: say how the attack works, and why you think it fails — it is too much to show that all the premises survive all attacks! Whether you attack or defend the argument, then, you will cover roughly the same material: some one significant objection against a premise together with replies – either to say either to say the objection works, or to undercut it. Some suggestions are linked below. The way this assignment asks you to focus on a particular version of the argument and then its...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/26/2014 for the course PHIL 192 at CSU San Bernardino.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online