Summaryofargumenthttpphilosophycsusbedutroypascalargpd

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: validity and soundness MAKES DIRECT APPEAL TO OTHER SOURCES, AND ESPECIALLY WEB SOURCES USELESS: do not use them, and do not get caught up in plagiarism! Summary of argument: http://philosophy.csusb.edu/~troy/PascalArg.pdf (p. 170 of text) Suggested Objections: These are not meant as complete objections and replies! Rather, they are meant only to get your creative juices flowing. The idea would be to pick one and develop either the objection or a reply. You will probably not get much traction against the first premise. The interesting debate is about (2) and (3). 1. first objection against premise two: http://philosophy.csusb.edu/~troy/PascalP2aObj.pdf 2. second objection against premise two: http://philosophy.csusb.edu/~troy/PascalP2bObj.pdf 3. first objection against premise three: http://philosophy.csusb.edu/~troy/PascalP3aObj.pdf 4. second objection against premise three: http://philosophy.csusb.edu/~troy/PascalP3bObj.pdf...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online