Intro to Logic notes9

# Intro to Logic notes9 - 9 Monday 10:14 AM Review of methods...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 9 Monday, July 23, 2007 10:14 AM Review of methods we have covered for testing validity. Most recent method: Derivation. Conditional derivation 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) PQ Pr QR Pr SHOW: PR CD P As SHOW: R DD Q 1,4,O R 2,6,O 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) PR Pr QS Pr SHOW: (P&Q)(R&S) CD P&Q As SHOW: R&S DD P 4,&O R 1,6,O Q 4,&O S 2,8,O R&S 7,9,&I 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) QR Pr R(PS) Pr SHOW: (P&Q)S CD (P&Q) As SHOW: S DD P 4,&O Q 4,&O R 1,7,O PS 2,8,O S 6,9,O 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) (P&Q)R Pr SHOW: P(QR) CD P As SHOW: QR CD Q As SHOW: R DD P&Q 3,5,&I R 1,7,O Intro to Logic Page 1 Indirect Derivations Let's think of a way we might try to prove that the argument is valid Consider what the argument is saying: PQ; P~Q / ~P If we assume P, then Q If we assume P then ~Q So if we assume P then both Q and ~Q This is an obvious contradiction If we assume P then a contradiction follows So we assume ~P by modus tollens We want to show that P implies a contradiction and infer ~P by modus tollens We try to show by conditional derivation that if P, the (Q&~Q) This is allowed by the show line rule. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) PQ Pr P~Q Pr SHOW: ~P DD SHOW: P(Q&~Q) CD P As SHOW: Q&~Q DD Q 1,5,O ~Q 2,5,O Q&~Q 7,8,&I ~(Q&~Q) ??? ~P 4,10,O We could just introduce a rule that allows us to infer that this is false. We introduce Indirect Derivation. This gives us the contradiction symbol. XI A ~A _____ X XO X ______ A Reductio ad absurdum 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) PQ Pr P~Q Pr SHOW: ~P ID P As SHOW: X DD Q 1,4,O ~Q 2,4,O Intro to Logic Page 2 8) X 6,7,XI Intro to Logic Page 3 ...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 04/07/2008 for the course PHILOSOPHY 201 taught by Professor Morgan during the Spring '08 term at Rutgers.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online