This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Lecture 8 52 Dec 4, 2002 7.4 Bosons and Fermions Initially, the Pauli principle was just that, a postulate that two indistinguishable electrons (i.e. electrons with precisely the same quantum numbers) could not cohabitate. Together with the system of allowed energy levels in an atom, it explained the gradual filling of higher and higher atomic levels with in creasing number of atomic electrons. Without the Pauli principle, nothing would prevent electrons from all congregating in the lowest energy state, making life in an atom exceedingly dull, and prevent ing the wide variety of chemical properties of the elements. After discovery of the spin quantum num ber, and the discovery of the Dirac equation, it was quickly realized that the Pauli principle could be generalized to: no two indistinguishable fermions (i.e. halfinteger spin particles) can cohabitate in the same quantum state. Equivalently, and even more general: the wave function of a system of indistin guishable fermions is antisymmetric under interchange (switch in position ) of any two fermions. Consider the electron. Any electron is truly indistinguishable from any other, like identical cars with out license plates and VIN numbers. Consider two such indistinguishable particles, one of them with a wave function a ( r ), the other with b ( r ). Here, the subscript labels the quantum state that the electron is in. The overall twoparticle wave function may be written as ( r 1 , r 2 ) = a ( r 1 ) b ( r 2 ), where the la bels 1, 2 refer to the position of the first and second electron respectively. This follows directly from the fact that probabilities multiply: Prob( r 1 , r 2 ) = Prob(electron in state a at r 1 ) Prob(electron in state b at r 2 )  ( r 1 , r 2 ) 2 =  a ( r 1 )  2  b ( r 2 )  2 ( r 1 , r 2 ) = a ( r 1 ) b ( r 2 ) If the two switch place, no observable effects should ensue, i.e. ( r 1 , r 2 ) = ( r 2 , r 1 ). However, with the twoparticle wave function as defined above, one quickly notes a problem: ( r 1 , r 2 ) = a ( r 1 ) b ( r 2 ) a ( r 2 ) b ( r 1 ) = ( r 2 , r 1 ) The way out is to change the twoparticle wave function so that it explicitly incorporates indistin guishability: ( ) 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 ( , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( , ) ( , ) a b b a C = = r r r r r r r r r r (I.137) where C is some normalization constant. Depending on the sign in (I.137), the wave function changes sign under interchange of the two particles, i.e. it is symmetric or antisymmetric under particle inter change. These two possibilities are fundamental: it turns out that systems with identical fermions (half integer spin particles, e.g. electrons) must be antisymmetric under interchange of any pair of fermions, whereas the wave function describing a system of indistinguishable bosons (integer spin particles) is symmetric under interchange of any pair of them: 1 1 1...
View
Full
Document
 Fall '01
 Rijssenbeek
 Physics

Click to edit the document details