Emma Lee vs CA.docx - G.R. No. 177861 July 13, 2010 IN RE:...

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

The preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.
G.R. No. 177861 July 13, 2010IN RE: PETITION FOR CANCELLATION AND CORRECTION OF ENTRIES IN THE RECORD OFBIRTH,EMMA K. LEE,Petitioner,vs.COURT OF APPEALS, RITA K. LEE, LEONCIO K. LEE, LUCIA K. LEE-ONG, JULIAN K. LEE,MARTIN K. LEE, ROSA LEE-VANDERLEK, MELODY LEE-CHIN, HENRY K. LEE, NATIVIDADLEE-MIGUEL, VICTORIANO K. LEE, and THOMAS K. LEE, represented by RITA K. LEE, asAttorney-in-Fact,Respondents.FACTS:Spouses Lee Tek Sheng (Lee) and Keh Shiok Cheng (Keh) entered the Philippines in the 1930s asimmigrants from China. They had 11 children, collectively, the Lee-Keh children.In 1948, Lee brought from China a young woman named Tiu Chuan (Tiu), supposedly to serve ashousemaid. The respondent Lee-Keh children believe that Tiu left the Lee-Keh household, movedinto another property of Lee nearby, and had a relation with him.Shortly after Keh died in 1989, the Lee-Keh children learned that Tiu’s children with Lee (collectively,the Lee’s other children) claimed that they, too, were children of Lee and Keh. This prompted the

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 2 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
NoProfessor
Tags
Test, Subpoena duces tecum, Subpoena ad testificandum, EMMA K LEE

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture