Unformatted text preview: this on the ground that only one bullet struck Summers in his eye which means that either he or Simonson fired that round but only one of them. Combined with previous testimony it cannot be proved that it was a round fired by Tice that was the proximate cause of Summers injury, and it is even more likely that this round came from Simonson’s shotgun. Ruling: In appeal judgment was affirmed. Court Rationale:...
View Full Document
- Fall '08
- Law, Summers, Tice, Simonson, Case Brief Summers