Reading Notes #1

Reading Notes #1 - Reading Notes #1 February 27, 2007 ANTH...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Reading Notes #1 February 27, 2007 ANTH 499 Essay #2 gives the notion that odors can often be used as ‘indicants of moral purity’ for groups. Foul odors can be reflected negatively within the social order, with actual consequences within society. The way one smells to others in a society particularly determines his/her own moral identity. Bad scents/smells are normally avoided by the majority of a typical society. Stereotypes of particular peoples can arise as part of a result of the malodor they emit. This is particularly true of the stereotype that African Americans are foul smelling, which has developed over time by white racists. ‘Skunks’ and ‘roses’ are stereotypes that emerged through social interpretations. These socially-generated stereotypes through perceptions have even identified farmers with manure and consequentially labeled them as ‘earthy-dirty’. I found this essay to be very enlightening. It contained a very true and an accurate description of how different societies perceive odors and the stereotypes associated with them. I
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Reading Notes #1 - Reading Notes #1 February 27, 2007 ANTH...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online