Paper - Abram Balloga Huan Dong International Relations...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Abram Balloga Huan Dong International Relations Research Paper 10/30/2005 Intuition Management Introduction: The world of international relations is one of philosophy, logic, and deep analysis. This essay will discuss and critique theories proposed by some of the field’s leading academic writers. After observing Kenneth Waltz’s Reductionist and Systemic Theories , Robert Gilpin’s Theory of Hegemonic War , and Samuel Huntingtion’s Clash of Civilizations? , I will test the predictability of their theories. As in science, a valid theory must demonstrate repeatability through experimentation – “A theory has explanatory and predictive power”. 1 The test scenario will be the current situation in Iraq, an action I call “intuition management”; the United States is desperately attempting to rally support for its cause amongst the common people of Iraq. Why does the US government, which certainly has the means to impose its will upon the Iraqi populace, insist that citizen support is imperative for success? Using realism and constructivist arguments, this article explores rational processes by which US officials may have come to this conclusion. Background: MUST FIND VALID SOURCE SHOWING THAT THE US IS ACTUALLY DOING INTUITION MANAGEMENT Shortly after September 11, 2001 the great and powerful United States was presented with a problem. This problem is that of negative propaganda in third world countries where the US found itself fighting the war on terrorism. American soldiers, quite the minority in Iraq, became the subjects of an avid anti-American campaign created and perpetuated by extreme and militant groups. In the third world, it is not difficult to construct a negative image of the opposition, especially when the opposition is a foreign military whose members have a different language, skin color, religion, system of government and basic way of life. It is easy to understand why Iraqi citizens might be fearful and suspicious of these unfamiliar and well armed occupiers. The militant and extremist groups gain much from this cultural friction. Earlier in the war, the US blundered unwittingly into this situation, indiscriminately fighting in and around mosques. The resulting damage to sacred and holy places sent out ripples of discontent amongst Muslims. Terrorists then rallied support through the portrayal of American’s as anti Islamic. Now, having learned the lesson in a difficult fashion, United States soldiers do not in most cases enter religious sanctuaries, but rather rely on Iraqi policemen to handle such situations. It will be next to impossible to win this war within the borders of Iraq without the consent of its people. As neither side of this war on terrorism may persist or hope to succeed without localized cooperation, a furious publicity and public relations battle is being fought in the streets of Iraq. This essay explores the following question – can constructivism and realism be used to discover
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This essay was uploaded on 09/26/2007 for the course GOVT 1817 taught by Professor Katzenstein, p during the Fall '05 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 7

Paper - Abram Balloga Huan Dong International Relations...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online