Constitutional Law,U of Colorodo

Constitutional Law,U of Colorodo - Chapter 1 Judicial...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 1- Judicial Review and Jurisdiction of Federal Cts in C-al cases SC has the power to declare the acts of Cs invalid. Ct is the last word on C-al interpretation. We are not final b/c we are infailable, we are infailable because we are final. No explicit textual grant in C for jud review. Marbury v. Madison C is the fundamental law, superior to ordinary legislation and binding to all parties. SC is supposed to interpret C. Holding: Marbury had a right to his commission, but SC could not enforce that because Marbury sued under a jurisdictional law that was unconstitutional. Issue #1: Does Marbury have a right to his commission? Yes, the commission became a vested legal right upon execution, and not delivery. Issue #2: Is there a legal remedy for the violation of this right? Yes, legal remedy needed for legal wrong. Issue #3 Is Marbury entitled to the remedy for which he applied at the SC? (a) What is the nature of the writ? Could the ct order the executive branch/president to do something? Yes- it is not the nature of the executive branch that limits the judicial review, but the nature of the act enacted by the executive branch. 2 Exceptions from judicial review: 1- If the action is political 2- If the C, placed the matter under the j/d of the Exec branch. + 3- ct’s institutional competence. (b) Does this ct have the power/jurisdiction to act? NO- article 3 of the C creates appellate jurisdiction for the Supreme Court. This means that in all other cases, you cannot increase the original. SC has original jurisdiction only in 3 classes of cases and congress cannot add to the original jurisdiction. SC has appellate j/d w/ such exceptions and regulations as Congress deems. Problems with Marbury- the C does not specifically say who should have the final say- it’s all inferences and assertions. - Marshall was too close to the issue and should have separated himself from the case. - It is clear that the Pres is subject to specific restraints under C, but Marshall asserts open ended powers of review. Principles established by Marbury: 1. Actions of the Exec are subject to judicial review under C. 2. Fed judiciary can order the executive to comply w/ C-al principles. 3. If an act is repugnant to the C invalidated. 4. C binds all parts of the fed gov- this is clear and there is a lot of historical support for it. 5. C is the supreme law and the judiciary is the branch who interprets it- it is at the very foundation of a unique document and the framers intended the judiciary to interpret issues arising under it- supremacy clause, oath of judges to uphold C, etc. 6. The judiciary has the final say on interpreting C decision binding on all branches of gov....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 21

Constitutional Law,U of Colorodo - Chapter 1 Judicial...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online