ch06 - CHAPTER 6 Note to Instructor: For computer...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CHAPTER 6 Note to Instructor: For computer exercises, the procedure Regression under Stat in Minitab can be used for the regression analysis except for computing confidence intervals on the regressor variables. Sections 6-2 6-1. a) The regression equation is Thermal = 0.0249 + 0.129 Density Predictor Coef StDev T P Constant 0.024934 0.001786 13.96 0.000 Density 0.128522 0.007738 16.61 0.000 S = 0.0005852 R-Sq = 98.6% R-Sq(adj) = 98.2% Analysis of Variance Source DF SS MS F P Regression 1 0.000094464 0.000094464 275.84 0.000 Residual Error 4 0.000001370 0.000000342 Total 5 0.000095833 x 129 . 0249 . y + = b) 0.0005747 -0.0007088 0.0001486 -0.0004799 -0.0000644 0.0005298 c) SSE = 0.000001370 = 0.000000342 2 d) se( ) = 0.007738, se( ) = 0.001786 1 e) SST = 0.000095833 SSR = 0.000094464, SSE = 0.000001370, and SSR + SSE = 0.000095834 SST = SSR + SSE f) R 2 = 98.6%. This is interpreted as 98.6% of the total variability in thermal conductivity can be explained by the fitted regression model. g) See the Minitab output given in part a. Based on the t-tests, we conclude that the slope and intercept are nonzero. h) See the Minitab output in part a. Based on the analysis of variance, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the regression is significant. i) : 0.024934 2.776(0.001786); 0.02, 0.03 1 : 0.128522 2.776(0.007738); 0.107, 0.15 j) Residual Plots 1 0.28 0.23 0.18 0.0005 0.0000-0.0005 Density Residual Residuals Versus Density (response is Conduct) 0.060 0.055 0.050 0.0005 0.0000-0.0005 Fitted Value Residual Residuals Versus the Fitted Values (response is Conduct) 2 0.0005 0.0000-0.0005 1-1 Normal Score Residual Normal Probability Plot of the Residuals (response is Conduct) k) r = 0.993, P-value = 0, Therefore, we conclude there is a significant correlation between density and conductivity. 6-2. a) The regression equation is Usage = - 6.34 + 9.21 Temp Predictor Coef StDev T P Constant -6.336 1.668 -3.80 0.003 Temp 9.20836 0.03377 272.64 0.000 S = 1.943 R-Sq = 100.0% R-Sq(adj) = 100.0% Analysis of Variance Source DF SS MS F P Regression 1 280583 280583 74334.36 0.000 Residual Error 10 38 4 Total 11 280621 x 21 . 9 34 . 6 y + = b) -1.25010 -0.19519 -0.30208 -1.61751 0.49740 2.07214 1.71688 -0.02329 -2.55294 -1.15260 -1.25734 4.06464 3 c) SSE = 38 2 = 4 d) se( 1 ) = 1.668, se( ) = 0.03377 e) SST = 280621 SSR = 280583, SSE = 38, and SSR + SSE = 280621 SST = SSR + SSE f) R 2 = 100%. This is interpreted as 100% of the total variability in Usage can be explained by the fitted regression model. g) See the Minitab output given in part a. Based on the t-tests, we conclude that the slope and intercept are nonzero....
View Full Document

This homework help was uploaded on 04/09/2008 for the course ENGR, STAT 320, 262, taught by Professor Harris during the Spring '08 term at Purdue University-West Lafayette.

Page1 / 47

ch06 - CHAPTER 6 Note to Instructor: For computer...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online