would make to the 1993 process is to balance the attention given to the financial andstrategy aspects of business rather than being so finance oriented. While finance is very important when it comes to investor relations and budgeting, coming up with better strategy and operation practices is what makes the business grow and drives the financial aspects of the business. My overall take on the 1996 changes is that it was a big improvement over the previous design. The new plan allowed for more freedom among business leaders which speeds up the creative process of strategy formulation. It made the business more dynamic and adaptive to changes in the market, even if that change only happened in one region.3.The criteria on which I would tell Jack Fuchs to evaluate the new SOF system are, first whether or not there is clear communication between the different worldwide teams to ensure a streamlined business process. Another criteria that should be used is whether or not realistic annual goals are being set and also if those goals are being made by each worldwide team. Finally, I would judge the success of the SOF onhow much freedom individual teams have in formulating region specific strategy so
Becton Dickinson Casethat the business can be more dynamic and adapt to regional changes without interference form top-level bureaucracy. 4.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 3 pages?
- Winter '16
- Business, Management, SOF, Becton Dickinson Case