{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

ECON301_Handout_10_1213_02

3 regress ˆ t c on wealth only ˆ t c 2441 005 t w t

Info iconThis preview shows pages 15–18. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
(3) Regress ˆ t C on wealth only: ˆ t C = 24.41 + 0.05 t W t (3.55) (13.29) R 2 = 0.96 Wealth variable is highly significant, whereas before it was insignificant. 4. Remedial Measures What can be done if multicollinearity is serious? We have two choices: (1) Do nothing (2) Follow some rules of thumb
Background image of page 15

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ECON 301 - Introduction to Econometrics I May 2013 METU - Department of Economics Instructor: Dr. Ozan ERUYGUR e-mail: [email protected] Lecture Notes 16 1. Do Nothing Multicollinearlity is essentially a data problem and some times we have no choice over the data that we have. 2. Some Rules of Thumb Some rules of thumb are as follows: 1. Use extraneous or prior information, For example, in the Cobb–Douglas–type production function, if one expects constant returns to scale to prevail, then (β2 + β3) = 1, in which case we could run the regression imposing this restriction, regressing the output-labor ratio on the capital-labor ratio. If there is collinearity between labor and capital, as generally is the case in most sample data, such a transformation may reduce or eliminate the collinearity problem. But a warning is in order here regarding imposing such a priori restrictions, “. . . since in general we will want to test economic theory’s a priori predictions rather than simply impose them on data for which they may not be true.” 2. Combine cross-sectional and time series data, This technique has been used in many applications and is worthy of consideration in situations where the cross-sectional estimates do not vary substantially from one cross section to another. 3. Omit a highly collinear variable, But in dropping a variable from the model we may be committing a specification bias or specification error.
Background image of page 16
ECON 301 - Introduction to Econometrics I May 2013 METU - Department of Economics Instructor: Dr. Ozan ERUYGUR e-mail: [email protected] Lecture Notes 17 Thus, if economic theory says that income and wealth should both be included in the model explaining the consumption expenditure, dropping the wealth variable would constitute specification bias. 4. Obtain additional or new data. Since multicollinearity is a sample feature, it is possible that in another sample involving the same variables collinearity may not be so serious as in the first sample. Sometimes simply increasing the size of the sample (if possible) may attenuate the collinearity problem. An often suggested remedy for multicollinearity is simply increasing the size of the sample, when possible. This remedy make sense from the perspective that increasing the sample size will improve the precision of OLS estimators; thus, reducing the adverse effects of multicollinearity. 5. Transform the variables. For example one could estimate a per capita version of the equation.
Background image of page 17

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 18
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page15 / 18

3 Regress ˆ t C on wealth only ˆ t C 2441 005 t W t 355...

This preview shows document pages 15 - 18. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online