World bank economist herman daly points out the kinds

This preview shows page 29 - 31 out of 59 pages.

World Bank economist Herman Daly points out the kinds of definitions of sustainability that he finds to be counterproductive. They include "sustainable development is development that sustains the highest rate of economic growth without inflation." That's just business as usual, described a little differently, so that our present notion of growth will keep its course. Or: "Sustainability considers the expanding needs of a growing world population, implying a steady and necessary growth." It implies that development will need to be continuous and steady, instead of requiring any leveling off to meet a carrying capacity. Formulations like these are inadequate, so Daly himself proposes three specific rules of sustainability to make sense in economic terms: 1. Harvest renewable resources only at the speed at which they regenerate. 2. Limit wastes to the assimilative capacity of local ecosystems. 3. Require that part of the profit be put aside for investment in a renewable substitute resource. And for him, sustainable development does not follow from more free trade between production and consumption ecosystems across global lines. For a nation to create a sustainable economy, it must step back from the global economy. Sustainability requires a smaller scale bound in which to be tested. It will begin as an experiment, not as law. This is the remarkable potential of EXPO 2000. Imagined as a sustainable community, it will be a model for the planet of what a sustainable settlement might look like in our increasingly complicated world.
Examples of sustainability are not hard to cull from the history of world cultures. But most often they are small scale social solutions that involve a small number of people who do little or no damage to their surrounding habitat. And often there is no design or designer which guides the inhabitation of the place. But now the complex of human/nature interactions is more intricate and overlapping, and the scale of change gets faster all the time. We cannot simply set up a benign situation and let an innovative solution slowly evolve to meet ecological constraints. Design is necessary, but a very special kind of design that does not claim to control more than it knows. We find hopeful, if distant, examples in works such as Bernard Rudofsky's Architecture without Architects . Villages, cities, fortresses, and monasteries are presented from traditional cultures across the globe. Buildings are arranged so that the flows of wind are channeled and harnessed, not blocked and diverted. It is clear that they have had the luxury of time: no one commissioned these structures and demanded them built and ready for use in a year or two. Intervention was slow enough to be tested by the strength of natural forces and the sobering spirit of time. Still, the structures of less mechanistic cultures are those that have endured the longest, suggesting that sustainable building relies less on an absolute coherent plan than on the cooperation between designers and end-users.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture