Children as young as three years old were taken away

Info icon This preview shows pages 4–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Children as young as three years old were taken away from their parents and transferred to schools miles away. Within these schools, the children were forced to accept the English culture and were taught to lose their sense of their Indian identity. As soon as they arrived, they had to adopt an English name and from then on, were beaten if their native language was ever spoken. An entire generation of Native Americans was kept in these schools for six to eight years. Many did not make it out alive, for they either died from loneliness, harsh conditions, trying to escape, or the development of psychological problems. Psychological problems developed because the kids were stripped of their Native culture and rituals, and were also not accepted within the white community, basically leaving them lost and with nothing. (Cannery Effect) These examples, which depict the Euro-American control over the Native Americans, are definite indicators that this event was in fact genocidal. The opposing argument presented by Brenden Rensink, in the article, “Genocide of Native Americans: Historical Facts and Historiographic Debates”, focuses on the number of victims killed and the intent to destroy a targeted group of people in whole or in part as the two main determining factors of a genocide. If it were only based on the number killed then this event would definitely be considered as a genocide, but when the intent factor is added in, the issue become mores complicated than anticipated. The article points out that “the concept of genocide in Native American history must first be analyzed in the micro, rather than the macro scale” (Rensink). When studying individual interactions between the Euro-Americans and the Native Americans, there are genocidal moments. However, other scenarios are seen only as
Image of page 4

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
campaigns, relationships, and cultural negotiations, which are not justified as genocides. There were other incidence’s where “the horror of the events was unquestionable but the underlying historical context of each was not explicitly genocidal” (Rensick). This was the case of the Wounded Knee Massacre and the Battle of Washita River; where no actual intent was made.
Image of page 5
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern