Hypothetical
:
Suppose A owns Redacre and B owns the adjacent parcel Orangeacre.
Both parcels are undeveloped, mountainous
land.
A plans to create a vacation subdivision on Redacre where weary city residents can relax in peaceful quiet.
A and B accordingly
enter into an agreement whereby B promises that no industrial uses will be permitted on Orangeacre in exchange for a $50,000
payment from A.
A develops the subdivision and conveys all the lots to buyers.
B then leases Orangeacre to C for a term of 60 years
and C builds a noisy lumber mill on the land.
g.
The lot owners (A’s successors) cannot enforce the promise against C (B’s successor) as a real covenant.
Why?
Because
both horizontal and vertical privity are missing!
h.
This example illustrates the limitations of the real covenant.
The traditional threshold for establishing a real covenant is
quite high.
The equitable servitude was invented in the 19
th
Century to fill this doctrinal vacuum.
It is generally easier to
enforce a promise as an equitable servitude than as a real covenant because the requirements for an equitable servitude are
more liberal than the requirements for a real covenant.
32

You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 32 pages?
- Spring '16
- Ausness
- Property Law, The Land, Future interest