Table 0 2 project seminars and conferences on peia in

Table 0-2: Project Seminars and conferences on PEIA in China, attended by Project partners
Seminar details In-text reference
All-partner and stakeholder meeting, Beijing, Xi’an and Chengdu, 11-19 June 2007 S1
All-partner meeting, Amsterdam, 29-30 October 2007 S2
CATS, ACEE and European partners meeting, Beijing, 2-3 June 2008 S3
All-partner meeting, Chengdu, 17-20 November 2008 S4
Workshop on Chinese Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment legislation and Interna-
tional Experiences, organised by China’s SEPA (MEP as of 2008) and GTZ, Beijing, 27-28
September 2007
C1
International Conference on SEA, organised by SEPA – in collaboration with the International
Association of Impact Assessment, 3-4 November 2007, Beijing
C2/ SEPA 2008
Chinese SEA Academic Forum, organised by the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Nan-
kai University, Hong Kong, 27 February-3 March 2009.
C3

6
planning of the Chinese transport and energy sector
through participation;
development institutions and banks who implement •
or are planning to carry out projects in China in
energy, transport and environment, such as the
World Bank or Asian Development Bank;
Chinese students and scholars interested in European •
and Chinese perspectives on environmental policy
integration and assessment.
The technical annexes provide more detailed information
aimed at practitioners.

7
T
hroughout the project “Policy Instruments for a
Chinese Sustainable Future”, SEA and China’s
PEIA, are considered instruments within the broader
framework of Environmental Policy Integration (EPI).
This section explains the linkage between EPI and
PEIA/SEA, and presents a brief overview of EPI in
China. For more background and details one can refer
to CHINA-EPI-SEA Paper No. 28 and the article by
Bina (2008b), on which this section is based.
1.1 EPI: OBJECTIVES AND FRAMEWORK
Generally speaking, SEA is an established term with
a defined process, methodologies and practices.
Environmental Policy Integration (EPI), on the
other hand, is a more recent term that refers to the
policy principle first established by the Brundtland
Commission in 1987:
‘The major central economic and sectoral agencies of
governments should now be made directly responsible
and fully accountable for ensuring that their policies,
programmes and budgets support development that
is ecologically, as well as economically sustainable’
(WCED 1987: 314).
The expression EPI was coined, subsequently, to
refer to this policy principle, and more broadly
to the suggestion ‘that environmental thinking
should be integrated into sectoral policy making at
the earliest available opportunity in order to make
human development more sustainable’ (Jordan and
Lenschow 2008: xvii). It is concerned with the need
for profound innovation in solving the tension between
environment and development, and in particular
for changes in traditional political orientation
and institutional arrangements, all emphasised by
the Brundtland Commission. EPI describes the
relationship between a wide range of practices and
activities (including SEA), that have been carried