There was a report in the media of a six week study of consumers at a movie

There was a report in the media of a six week study

This preview shows page 16 - 20 out of 24 pages.

There was a report in the media of a six-week study of consumers at a movie theater in Fort Lee, New Jersey, in 1956, where marketing specialist James Vicary had secretly used the tachistoscope along with the movie projectors to flash suggestions to buy popcorn and Coke. The tachistoscope was an invention Vicary came across in his dealings. The tachistoscope is a machine, not unlike a film 14
projector, with one major difference. The tachistoscope could flash beams of light so rapidly that the human eye could not perceive the transmission. It projected its information by way of a beam of light at 1/60,000th of a second. Vicary tried to sell his idea to the large advertising agencies and corporations. His persuasive sales pitch was that consumers would comprehend information that they could not literally see. He sent a news release to the major media announcing his discovery without any scientific validation whatsoever. The reports of this fed the public fears and imagination in a powerful way which turned out to be much more potent than the method in Vicary's study. His study in fact turned out to be a hoax, as admitted by Vicary's colleagues and demonstrated by repeated failures to replicate the supposed effect. There still have been no successful replications to this date, or any clear evidence that subliminal messages produced by the tachistoscope can significantly influence behavior. What passes for evidence of 15
subliminal persuasion is simply reliable evidence that subjects detect some stimuli that they are not aware of detecting, and that such perception can influence simple lexical priming tasks, not attitudes or behaviors. This subthreshold detection effect occurs in laboratory situations when subjects are already highly motivated to guess correctly and when they are forced to guess in multiple choice situations. So far, it has never been demonstrated in more natural settings. This is a far cry from the claims of manufacturers that their subliminal products can plant suggestions into people's minds that they are then compelled to follow. Numerous tests on modern subliminal technologies have turned up no evidence of a subliminal persuasion effect. The closest thing found has been a placebo-type effect that is not related to the content of the messages, but to the expectations of the user, and even that seems to result in a mostly illusory benefit. They perceive a benefit in accordance with their expectations of a benefit, but more objective 16
measures failed to validate any such benefit as an outcome of the experiment. Given that the majority of evidence contradicts the popular notion that our subconscious mind can be programmed with invisible or unheard commands, at least in any straightforward sense we still have some interesting evidence that much more is processed by our brains than we are aware of being processed. In addition to the recent lexical priming experiments, previous research had seemingly shown that tachistoscopically presented pictures of

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture