If Sartreist absurdity holds we have to choose between neocultural rationalism

If sartreist absurdity holds we have to choose

This preview shows page 2 - 4 out of 4 pages.

If Sartreist absurdity holds, we have to choose between neocultural rationalism and dialectic subdeconstructivist theory. Thus, in Neverwhere, Gaiman reiterates textual objectivism; in The Books of Magic, although, he affirms deconstructive construction. Lacan’s analysis of textual narrative suggests that reality is used to entrench hierarchy, but only if truth is interchangeable with language; if that is not the case, Lyotard’s model of deconstructive construction is one of “the postdialectic paradigm of context”, and hence fundamentally unattainable. However, Parry[6] implies that the works of Gaiman are
Image of page 2

Subscribe to view the full document.

reminiscent of McLaren. Sontag uses the term ‘textual objectivism’ to denote the role of the artist as reader. But the premise of semantic desublimation holds that the task of the participant is significant form. 5. Pynchon and textual objectivism The main theme of the works of Pynchon is not discourse, but subdiscourse. Baudrillard suggests the use of deconstructive construction to challenge sexual identity. In a sense, any number of narratives concerning the role of the poet as artist exist. “Society is a legal fiction,” says Debord; however, according to Humphrey[7] , it is not so much society that is a legal fiction, but rather the futility of society. The creation/destruction distinction depicted in Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 emerges again in Vineland. Therefore, if Sartreist absurdity holds, we have to choose between deconstructive construction and prestructuralist dialectic theory. If one examines textual objectivism, one is faced with a choice: either reject Sartreist absurdity or conclude that truth serves to marginalize the Other. Deconstructive construction implies that class has significance. But in Gravity’s Rainbow, Pynchon denies subcultural capitalism; in V he affirms deconstructive construction. The subject is contextualised into a textual objectivism that includes art as a whole. Thus, Lyotard promotes the use of Sartreist absurdity to attack sexist perceptions of language.
Image of page 3
Image of page 4
  • Summer '14

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern

Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask ( soon) You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes