57The lifestyle intervention reducedthe incidence of type 2 diabetes by 58% (95% confidence interval 48–66%) andmetformin by 31% (95% confidence interval 17–43%) as compared with placebo.The goals for the lifestyle modification involved achieving and maintaining a weightreduction of at least 7% of initial body weight through a healthy low-calorie, low-fatdiet and at least 150 min of physical activity per week.Pre-transplant treatment of HCV-infected renal transplant candidates should beconsidered. Selection of an immunosuppressive regimen should be tailored to eachindividual patient, weighing the risk of developing diabetes after transplantationagainst the risk of acute rejection. Suggested pre-transplant baseline evaluation ofpotential transplant candidates is shown in Fig. 16.2.
16Diabetes Mellitus and Transplantation: Risks for Post-transplant Diabetes267PRE-TRANSPLANT BASELINE EVALUATION•Complete medical care and familyhistory•Glucose history•Fasting plasma glucose•2-hour oral glucose tolerance test1•Counseling:•Weight control•Diet•Exercise•Consider pre-transplant treatmentof HCV-infected candidates•Diabetogenicity of immunosuppressive agents:Corticosteroids > Tac > CSASirolimus2•Individualization of immunosuppressiveagents3•Steroid-sparing or withdrawal regimen•Tac to CSA switch•CNI minimization protocol•Management of established NODAT: pleaserefer to Table 2Identify high-risk candidatesPre-transplantPost-transplant1Please see text;2Further studies are needed, see text;3Modification of immunosuppressive regimen should be done at thediscretion of the transplant physicianAbbreviations:Tac: tacrolimus, CSA: cyclosporine, CNI: calcineurin inhibitorFig. 16.2Pre-transplant baseline evaluationEarly Detection of NODAT After TransplantationStudies investigating the best predictive tool for identifying patients at risk for devel-oping NODAT early after transplantation are currently lacking. In a single-centerprospective study consisting of 359 de novo renal transplant recipients, Kuyperset al.44demonstrated that a normal (vs. diabetic) OGTT on day 5 was associ-ated with a significantly reduced risk for NODAT (odds ratio 0.03,P=0.0002).A similar reduction in the risk of NODAT was conferred by a normal FPG onday 5 (odds ratio 0.06;P< 0.0001). [NODAT was defined as the uninterruptedneed for glucose-lowering therapy for at least 3 months following transplanta-tion. The up-to-date American Diabetes Association criteria were used to defineimpaired glucose tolerance (IGT), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and diabetesmellitus (DM).] Although an OGTT at 5 days after transplantation might proveto be a clinically useful predictive diagnostic tool for the eventual development ofNODAT, Kuypers et al.’s study results should be interpreted with caution. The studyincluded predominantly white patients (91.4%), negligible number of black (1.4%),and no Hispanics. The inclusions of more blacks or Hispanics or both would mostprobably have increased the percentage of patients destined to develop NODAT,thereby increasing the positive predictive values of both OGTT and FPG on day 5,while decreasing their negative predictive values. Furthermore, baseline evaluation
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
End of preview. Want to read all 411 pages?
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Term
Fall
Professor
N/A
Tags