regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics, and timeliness. Specifically: For the most part, focuses on specific information based on the answer to the selected question and is answered in a clear way. Personal and practical application is included in the answer. Provides the required number and type of references asked for within the question. Advances the discussion in a way that contributes to the learning of the participants (provides new ideas and insights, asks probing questions that get to the heart of critical issues, and shares from personal and professional experience). 1 to 44 points Fair work in most areas – Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of topics, and timeliness. Specifically: Question is answered minimally and in a less- than-clear manner. Basic instructions and requirements for the assignment are only minimally followed. In the Thread, the specific information based on the answer is minimally defined, and concepts from the textbook and other required readings are applied in a vague and indirect manner. Biblical integration is weak. Each required source is cited at least once. Scholarly sources (from peer-reviewed journals) are used. All postings are the required length (Thread = 400/500 words.) 0 points Failing. Student demonstrates insufficient work in one or more of the following areas: Specifically: Posts are unfocused; concepts are not applied in a clear way.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read both pages?
- Summer '14