19791974197473898 ingraham v wright 1977 ingraham v

  • No School
  • AA 1
  • 4

This preview shows page 2 - 4 out of 4 pages.

Ingraham v. Wright (1977) Ingraham v. Wright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on April 19, 1977, ruled (5–4) that corporal punishment in public schools did not violate constitutional rights. The case centred on James Ingraham, an eighth-grade student at a public junior high school in Florida, who in 1970 was paddled by the principal (Willie J. Wright) while being restrained by the assistant principal (Lemmie
Image of page 2
Deliford) and the principal’s assistant (Solomon Barnes). Ingraham was hit more than 20 times and required medical attention. A complaint was filed (1971) on behalf of Ingraham and Roosevelt Andrews, another student at the school who had also been paddled. The complaint claimed that the use of corporal punishment violated both the Eighth Amendment ’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishments” and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , which requires prior notice and an opportunity to be heard. A district court dismissed the complaint, and the decision was upheld by the court of appeals. In November 1976 the case was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. The following year the court ruled that the Eighth Amendment was not applicable to corporal punishment in public schools. The justices held that the amendment applied only to those convicted of a crime. In the majority opinion, Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. , wrote that “the prisoner and the schoolchild stand in wholly different circumstances, separated by the harsh facts of criminal conviction and incarceration.” As to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court ruled that since corporal punishment was “authorized and limited by common law,” it did not violate the due process clause. The justices noted the various states’ procedural safeguards that subjected teachers and administrators who inflicted unreasonable or excessive corporal punishment to civil or criminal liability. In reaching its decision, the court gave great weight to the historical tradition of corporal punishment in public schools in the United States, the long-standing common-law requirement that corporal punishment be reasonable but not excessive, and the impracticalities of requiring notice and a hearing each time a teacher decides to corporally punish a student. The tradition of judicial deference to the judgment of educators and school administrators regarding the education of children was also influential in the court’s opinion. In addition, the justices identified certain factors—such as the age of the child and the type of punishment—that courts consider in making determinations as to whether corporal punishment is reasonable. Horowitz v. Board of Curators (1978) Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978) (Brief by Nicholas Stroup for HIED 7210) Facts: Horowitz was admitted to the Missouri-Kansas City Medical School in 1971, but was dismissed in her final year for failure to meet academic standards. Horowitz was put on probation after her first year because the faculty was concerned by her lack of attention to personal hygiene and sub-par work in “clinical patient- oriented settings.” Faculty were dissatisfied the following year, and suggested Horowitz be dropped from the
Image of page 3
Image of page 4

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 4 pages?

  • Fall '19
  • Supreme Court of the United States, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes