100%(5)5 out of 5 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 3 out of 3 pages.
89. Compare and contrast SQL and FileMaker as practical relational DBMSs.Reporting - SQL doesn’t have many built in features that make reports. FileMaker makes it really easy to create your own layouts / views so you can customize how you present the data.Querying - SQL is simpler to write queries and search a database. FileMaker requires many steps, like creating a layout, then you have to go to certain modes and the restrictions are less intuitive than SQL. Adding Data - adding data is much easier to do in FileMaker since you can make records like you can in Excel by adding rows. SQL can be tricky sometimes since the UI is not as intuitive when adding new data.Validation - It’s easier to set up rules (required, unique, value lists, data type, etc…) in FileMaker because it’s a dialogue box when you create the field than it is to in SQL. However, SQL offers more flexibility & complexibility with the constraints that can be set up like, referencing other fields.90. Compare and contrast SQL and FileMaker with respect to the kinds of joins they can perform. Can any join you do in FileMaker be done in SQL? Can any join you do in SQL be done in FileMaker?