2/17/23, 10:39 AMTopic: Week 4 Discussion59/71Replya payback period analysis, the accounting rate of return, and the internal rate of return(Kluwer, W. 2020). I've also found that when choosing between competing projects, ananalyst would likely decide it's better to invest in a project that has a shorter paybackperiod than others with longer payback periods because they're less risky. Essentially,while I think NPV is critical and should always be used, there are several other factors aswell that project investment analysts need to look at to evaluate the entire picture. Theother methods I described would definitely come in handy when evaluating severaldifferent projects that all have similar NPVs to decide which would be the best to invest in.Reference:Kluwer, W. (2020, June 11). Financial Analysis of Major Projects. Back to the top.Retrieved February 3, 2023, from-insights/financial-analysis-of-major-projects()(https:/Saiprakash Reddy Palle()Feb 1, 2023Greetings,You should ensure that any major project you undertake has fewer overall costs than it hastotal benefits. If you add up the costs over the next few years, then you could compare that withthe increase in revenue and cost savings you expect. Nonetheless, if you did so, you'd beoverlooking the fact that many costs will arise early in the project while many revenues or costsavings will accumulate later. A number of methods can be used to determine the cost andbenefit of a project.Payback Period:This measure of investment risk is used to determine the time it will take for the net initialinvestment in a project to recoup in terms of net cash inflows. The time value of money as wellas the net cash flow after the initial investment are not considered when assessing the risk ofinvestments with a shorter payback period.Accounting Rate of Return