Photo 5 shows the structure as it was positioned when the PSA team arrived at theincident site. The structure had then been lowered to the deck and had folded overso that the beams which had supported the deck gratings are sticking up in thephoto. It was part of this structure which struck slinger 1.Photo 5is from the PSA team’sinspection of the incident site.4.3After the incidentThe crane operator secured the load by lowering the structure to the deck as shownin photo 5. It twisted through about 110 degrees and moved roughly half a metrenorth in relation to where it was hanging before the incident.4.4TimelineThe timeline specifies activities from ASK receiving the job to produce the lifting planfor the frame and until the injured person arrived in hospital.DateTimeEvent24 Oct 19WO 32617–“Cut tote tank frames (east and west) andsecure with latches until removal of cut loose items”established in Pims.2 Jan 20WO 34949–“Remove tote tank frames (east and west)(use of crane)”. Job established in Pims.
1313 Oct 20WO 32617–“Cut tote tank frames (east and west) andsecure with latches until removal of cut loose items”isgiven status W40, which means issued for construction.13 Oct 20WO 34949–“Remove tote tank frames (east and west)(use of crane)” isissued for construction.1 Nov 20Job WO 32617–“Cut tote tank frames (east and west)and secure with latches until removal of cut looseitems” receivedoffshore.21 Mar 21Job WO 34949–“Remove tote tank frames (east andwest) (use of crane)” receivedoffshore.6 May 21Job WO 32617 -“Cut tote tank frames (east and west)and secure with latches until removal of cut looseitems”commenced (this is the first day when progresswith the work was reported).12 May 21ASK had completed its WO, and Equinor waited forload carriers to transport the cut structures to land.13 May 2106.30Morning meeting of the logistics team, when the daywas planned.morningArrival of ship, load carriers for the structures received.afternoonWork of shifting structures to load carriers begins.13 May 2115.52Incident occurs15.53Notification of personal injury on RP weather deck overthe PA system. Medic and first aiders musters inaccordance with instructions.15.56First patient contact.16.20Injured person reaches the hospital on Johan Sverdrup.16.20PSA receives notice of the incident by phone16.35Patient transport from hospital to helideck.16.42SAR takes off from Johan Sverdrup.17.42SAR lands at Haukeland.5Potential of the incidentActual consequencePersonal injury with lost time.The incident caused no substantial material damage or consequences for theenvironment.Potential consequenceUnder slightly different circumstances, the incident could have caused a fatality.
146Direct and underlying causes6.1Direct causesThe direct causes of the incident were that the structure moved out of control at thesame time as the injured person moved into the exposed area when the structure wasreleased from the first ratchet strap. This led to them being crushed between thestructure and the tote tank frame.
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
End of preview. Want to read all 19 pages?
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Term
Fall
Professor
NoProfessor
Tags
Lifting hook, Johan Sverdrup