counterpart, the character we see in Camus's play is not supposed to be anaccurate representation of the man. The actual Roman Emperor may, or maynot, bear close resemblance to the title character of the play, but we are onlyinterested in the Caligula Camus created, not the historical figure. Martha isalso a work of fiction and so is Patrice Meursault. In what follows, I will beclaiming that Meursault is an unreal character and that the events that occurinThe Strangerare also unreal. Obviously, the characters and events in thetwo plays are works of fiction and did not occur in 'real life'. My point willbe that unlike Caligula and Martha, Meursault could not exist in real life.That is, he is not real enough to be an illustration of an actual personexperiencing the Absurd. In fact, this being so, it would be a mistake to takeMeursault as an example; certainly not one to follow. Rather misleadingly,Camus once referred to this character with 'ironic affection' as “the onlyChrist that we deserve.”1The person we usually associate with the titleChrist, is Jesus of Nazareth. According to Christians he possesses twoparadoxical qualities: a human nature and a God nature; he was the God-Man. Meursault does not contain two natures. Camus did not intend to makehim a god but he didn't make him human either. In the first half of this paper(sections I-III) I will look at the character of Meursault and the unreality ofthe man and the events that surround him. In the second half (sections IV-VI)I will, by comparison with Caligula and Martha, look at the role humannature plays in the Absurd.1Albert Camus,Afterword, The Outsider (Penguin 1982) p.118