Exercise 6 6 1 scare tactics 2 argument from pity 3

Info iconThis preview shows pages 3–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Exercise 6-6 ▲1. Scare tactics 2. Argument from pity 3. No fallacy ▲4. Scare tactics and red herring; the latter ecause a reason to fly is irrelevant to whether you should fly Fracaso 5. Peer pressure/groupthink 6. Guilt trip ▲7. Appeal to tradition 8. Argument from outrage 9. Groupthink ▲10. Nationalism Exercise 6-7 1. b 2. e 3. d 4. e 5. e, although "classic" may be a euphemism here 6. d ("mere") 7. b IM – 6&7 | 3
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
8. c Exercise 6-8 ▲1. No fallacy 2. Peer pressure 3. Argument from outrage, and a miffed appeal to popularity ▲4. No fallacy 5. Apple polishing 6. Groupthink/appeal to popularity ▲7. Argument from outrage 8. Scare tactics 9. Red herring ▲10. Scare tactics and red herring. This combination shows up frequently (e.g., in 6-6, #1; 6-7, #8) 11. Apple polishing 12. There is a slight appeal to pity here, but we think this is a fairly legitimate appeal, especially given the claim about no raises in five years. ▲13. Red herring, and a lame one at that 14. The third item is an appeal to popularity. Whether lots of people favor one side of this issue does not strike us as relevant to whether that side is correct. ▲15. Red herring 16. No fallacy 17. Red herring, and a dumb one 18. Appeal to pity, but we’d be willing to hear the speaker out ▲19. Rationalizing, red herring, a bit of appeal to common practice 20. Red herring. The criticisms given of Alexander are not irrelevant to what kind of person he was, nor whether he benefitted unduly from his position. But these criticisms are not directly relevant to whether he did any good for American education. 21. This is best described as ridicule. ▲22. The most obvious fallacy present here is the scare tactics we see from Rep. Welker. He is also guilty of a slippery slope fallacy, discussed in the next chapter. Under one interpretation of the situation, one might also find Rep. Paccione guilty of a red herring, since the original point of the news conference was whether there should be a constitutional amendment barring gays and lesbians from marrying, and Rep. Paccione introduces a separate issue having to do with health care. But her claim—that, as long as the health care issue remains unsolved, it is not good policy to argue about other matters such as same-sex marriage—is relevant. Whether it’s true is another matter; argument would be necessary to establish that. 23. Two wrongs make a right IM – 6&7 | 4
Background image of page 4
Chapter 7 Exercise 7-1 ▲1. Inconsistency 2. Inconsistency 3. Poisoning the well ▲4. Genetic fallacy 5. Genetic fallacy 6. Inconsistency ▲7. Circumstantial 8. Circumstantial 9. Circumstantial. Notice that the real problem here is that there is no evidence the sins of the son should be visited on the father. 10. Not surprisingly, we don’t think so.
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page3 / 11

Exercise 6 6 1 Scare tactics 2 Argument from pity 3 No...

This preview shows document pages 3 - 6. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online