42
The researcher faced significant time and cost constraints which limited the scope ofthe study. The study limited itself to supermarkets that are concentrated within NairobiCounty; it would have been more useful if the researcher collected data in anothertown outside Nairobi County in order to have some comparative findings and to drawconclusive results.5.6 Suggestions for Further ResearchFuture researchers might consider investigating the impact of IT used on inventorymanagement performance in large supermarkets in Kenya like Nakumatt, Naivas,Tuskys, Uchumi and Ukwala. This is because their level of adoption andimplementation of information technology is relatively high as compared to othercategories of supermarkets in Nairobi. The findings obtained in this study might beused to make a comparison with all the supermarkets in Kenya.This study was limited to Nairobi County; a similar study should be conducted inother counties across the country to establish the extent of adoption of IT in inventorymanagement and how it contributes to improved performance of supermarkets. Thiswill provide a platform to compare and identify areas of weaknesses and thusrecommend areas of improvement.43
REFERENCESAbernathy, F. H., Dunlop, J. T., Hammond, J. H., & Weil, D. (2000). Retailing andsupply chains in the Information age.Technology in Society,22(1), 5-31.Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economicorganization.The American Economic Review, 777-795.Atkinson, W. (2003). New buying tools present different ethical challenges.Purchasing,132(4), 27-29.Bakos, J. Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). From vendors to partners: Informationtechnology and incomplete contracts in buyersupplier relationships.Journalof Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,3(3), 301-328.Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal ofManagement,17(1), 99-120.Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology,organizational transformation and business performance.The Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, 1(3), 23-48.Carr, A. S., & Smeltzer, L. R. (2002). The relationship between informationtechnology use and buyer-supplier relationships: an exploratory analysis of thebuying firm's perspective.Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on,49(3), 293-304.Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1992). Information technology and industrialcooperation: the changing economics of coordination and ownership.Journalof Management Information Systems, 9-2844
Coase, R. H., (1937). The nature of the firm: Economica, readings in price Theory,Homewood, 1952, 331-51.Compton, H. K., & Jessop, D. (2001).The official dictionary of purchasing andsupply: terminology for buyers and suppliers. Liverpool Business PublishingJune 1, 2001.Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm:Knowledge versus opportunism,Organization Science,7(5), 477-501.
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
End of preview. Want to read all 67 pages?
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document