LINREG2

# 5 three possible alternative hypotheses(a β … 0

This preview shows pages 5–7. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 5 three possible alternative hypotheses: (a) β … 0: women are paid different hourly wages than men, either higher or lower; (b) β > 0: women are paid higher hourly wages than men; (c) β < 0: women are paid lower hourly wages than men. The last hypothesis is usually what is meant by “gender discrimination.” A test for the null hypothesis β = 0 against one of these alternative hypotheses can be based on the estimate of β , ˆ β provided that we know how is related to β . ˆ β It will be shown below that and are indeed reasonable approximations of α and β , ˆ α ˆ β respectively, possessing particular desirable properties. In general an estimator of an unknown parameter is a function of the data that serves as an approximation of the parameter involved. It follows from (1) that and are functions of ˆ α ˆ β the data, Because and will be used as approximations of α and β , ( Y 1 , X 1 ),...,( Y n , X n ). ˆ α ˆ β respectively, and were obtained by minimizing the squared errors, we will call and the ˆ α ˆ β Ordinary 2 Least Squares (OLS) estimators of α and β , respectively. 3.1 Unbiasedness The first property of and is that they are unbiased estimators of α and β : ˆ α ˆ β Proposition 1 . Under Assumptions II and IV the OLS estimators and are unbiased , which ˆ α ˆ β means that = E [ˆ α ] α and E [ ˆ β ] ' β . This result follows from the fact that we can write \$ " ' " % j n j ' 1 1 n & ¯ X ( X j & ¯ X ) ' n i ' 1 ( X i & ¯ X ) 2 . U j , \$ \$ ' \$ % ' n j ' 1 ( X j & ¯ X ) U j ' n i ' 1 ( X i & ¯ X ) 2 . (3) See the Appendix. 6 3.2 The variances of and ˆ α ˆ β . Our next issue concerns the variances of and . For deriving these variances the ˆ α ˆ β following two lemmas are convenient. Lemma 1 . Let U 1 , U 2 ,...,U n be independent random variables with zero mathematical expectation ( thus E ( U j ) = 0) and variance σ 2 . ( Thus E [( U j- E ( U j )) 2 ] = E ( U j 2 ) = σ 2 ). Let v 1 , v 2 ,..., v n and w 1 , w 2 ,..., w n be given constants. Then E [( ' n j ' 1 v j U j )( ' n j ' 1 w j U j )] ' σ 2 ' n j ' 1 v j w j . Proof . See the Appendix. Note that if we choose in Lemma 1 then it reads: v j ' w j for j ' 1,2,..., n Lemma 2 . Let U 1 , U 2 ,...,U n be independent random variables with zero mathematical expectation and variance σ 2 . Let w 1 , w 2 ,..., w n be given constants. Then E [( ' n j ' 1 w j U j ) 2 ] ' σ 2 ' n j ' 1 w 2 j . Using (3) and Lemmas 1 and 2 it can be shown that Proposition 2 . Under the assumptions I - IV, var( \$ " ) ' F 2 ' n j ' 1 X 2 j n ' n j ' 1 ( X j & ¯ X ) 2 ' F 2 \$ " , say , var( \$ \$ ) ' F 2 ' n j ' 1 ( X j & ¯ X ) 2 ' F 2 \$ \$ , say , and cov( \$ " , \$ \$ ) ' & F 2 ¯ X ' n j ' 1 ( X j & ¯ X ) 2 ....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page5 / 29

5 three possible alternative hypotheses(a β … 0 women...

This preview shows document pages 5 - 7. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online