6 evidence based medicine working group evidence

This preview shows page 70 - 72 out of 130 pages.

[6] Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992; 268: 2420-2425. [7] Fowkes FG, Fulton PM, Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. BMJ 1991: 1136- 1140. [8] Evidence-based health care. An open learning resources for health care professionals. Unit 3: Apprai- sing and interpreting evidence. Critical Skills Appraisal Programme and Health Care Libraries Unit. Lu- ton: Chiltern Press; 1999. [10] Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to keep up with the medical literature: I. why try to keep up and how to get started. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 149-153. [11] Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Asses- sing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trial 1996; 17: 1-12. [12] Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramèr MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything - large amounts of in- formation are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998, 78: 217-220. [13] Sacristán JA, Soto J, Galende I. Evaluación crítica de ensayos clínicos. Med Clin (Barc); 1993; 100: 780- 787. [14] Moer D, Schulz K, Altman D for the Consort Group. The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommen- dations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials JAMA 2001; 285: 1987-1991. [15] La declaración CONSORT: recomendaciones revisadas realizadas para mejorar la calidad de los infor- mes de ensayos aleatorizados de grupos paralelos. Traducción al castellano publicada en Rev Sanid Mi- lit Mex 2002; 56: 23-28. [16] Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1993; 270 (21): 2598-2601. [17] Sackett D, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Londres: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. [18] A Vickers, C Smith. Incorporating data from dissertations in systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16 (2): 711-713. [19] Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Meta-analysis to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative re- view of the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 235-243. [20] Smith L, Oldman A. Acupuncture and dental pain. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 158-159. [21] Jovell AJ, Navarro-Rubio. Evaluación de la evidencia científica. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 105: 740-743. Para engrosar el cuerpo de conocimiento enfermero son necesarios los resultados obtenidos de los estudios con diseños cuantitativos y cualitativos. Para poderlos valorar de forma objeti- va, el aprender habilidades en lectura crítica de cada uno de los distintos diseños es de gran utilidad. 70 excelencia Excelencia evi dencia Enfermería basada en la evidencia. Hacia la excelencia en los cuidados
[22] Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, Bowman M. Strength of recommen- dation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture