39CLERGY/MENTAL HEALTH PRACTITIONER COLLABORATIONtreatment. The majority of participants had obtained their education aboutmental health through self-study and research, while some had acquiredknowledge through personal and familial experiences.Such findings sug-gest that clergy value possessing knowledge of mental health and are awarethat congregants may look to them as first responders.Many participantsmay thus welcome further training on mental health issues.An overwhelming percentage of participants reported positive attitudestoward referring congregants with emotional challenges to mental healthprofessionals, preferring counseling centers to any other single resource.In fact, almost 70 percent endorsed referrals to such professionals withoutreservation. This result differs significantly from previous research (e.g.,study by Openshaw & Harr, 2009, involving 24 clergy members from theDallas/Fort Worth area, and a study by VanderWaal, Hernandez, & Sand-man, 2012, involving 179 clergy from Kent County, Michigan), and mayreflect a bias in Southern California subculture that is more amenable toaccessing the services of counseling professionals. The efforts of the statepublic mental health system to involve clergy members, as leaders in thefaith community, may also affect these results.As clergy are called upon to intervene in crises, recognize seriousmental health issues, and provide referrals and ongoing support andspiritual direction, they may benefit from collaboration with mental healthprofessionals to address these issues. According to Weaver (1995), pastorsand counselors would benefit from collaboration, especially given theshared common values and dedication to serve those in need.The natureof effective collaborative relationships between clergy and mental healthprofessionals should be further explored. Doing so may improve the mentalhealth services to congregants in need.