Insurance commisisoner v joyce facts drunk driver and

Info icon This preview shows pages 43–45. Sign up to view the full content.

Insurance Commisisoner v Joyce Facts: Drunk driver and drunk passenger Held: o Latham:In the case of a drunken driver all standards of care are ignored as such driver cannot be expected to act sensibly 1. Such driver is simply just chancing it 2. The Plaintiff voluntarily encountered the risk which was obviously associated with the drunken condition of the driver. o Dixon (dissenting)suggested reduced standard of care However this does not apply in cases whereby the Plaintiff was unaware the Defendant was drunk: Banovic v Perkovic Facts: o To make out volen case in drink driving situations, it requires that P perceived that the driver was or could be intoxicated to render him unsafe, and that he fully appreciated that it was dangerous to travel with him, and that neverthelss voluntarily decided to take the risk and travel with the passenger. o Provided that a person knows the intention of the driver (to stay sober) and there is no reasonable anticipation of the driver becoming
Image of page 43

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

intoxicated, then the P can drink as much as they please as it the D’s obligation to remain sober. o In the absence of some clear indication that the driver will fail to discharge his obligation, the passenger is not excepted to take precautions against such failure. Gala v Preston- Court held that this knowledge could be implied (P & D drinking together all day) OBVIOUS RISK PROVISION- EVIDENTIARY SHORTCUTS The Wrongs Act provides a shortcut for the defendant in the situation where the risk in question was an obvious risk. Under s.54(1) Wrongs Act , if the defence of voluntary assumption of risk defence is raised and the risk of harm of is an obvious risk, then the plaintiff is presumed to be aware of the risk, unless they can prove, on the balance of probabilities, that they were not aware of the risk. There is a limitation of s.54(1) - Under s.54(2) , it does not apply to: a) a proceeding in relation to a professional or health service b) a proceeding in respect of risks associated with work done by one person for another So, in either of these situations, the defendant must go through and show that the plaintiff was aware of the risks and assumed the risks. For the purposes of s.54 an obvious risk to a person who suffers harm is a risk that, in the circumstances, would have been obvious to a reasonable person in that position – this is set out in s.53 , which also provides some examples of when a risk will be obvious: - when the risk is patent or a matter of public knowledge ( s.53(2) ) - it does not have to be likely to occur to be obvious ( s.52(3) ) nor does it have to be prominent, conspicuous or physically observable ( s.52(4) ). - It is not an obvious risk if it arises because of a failure on the part of a person to properly operate, maintain, replace, prepare, or care for a thing, unless the failure itself is an obvious risk ( s.52(5) ).
Image of page 44
Image of page 45
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern