It multiplies any distortion associated with misallocation but is not itself

# It multiplies any distortion associated with

This preview shows page 19 - 21 out of 47 pages.

It multiplies any distortion associated with misallocation but is not itself affected by the allocation of resources. Second, the tax wedges affect output through TFP. Therefore, this proposition illustrates a very important result found elsewhere in the macro literature: the misallocation of resources at the microeconomic level often shows up as a reduction in TFP at the macroeconomic level. This result has been emphasized by Chari et al. (2007), Hsieh and Klenow (2007), and Restuccia and Rogerson (2007), and also plays a key role in Caselli and Gennaioli (2005) and Lagos 8 The solution for τ satisfies τ = (1 - σ (1 - τ )) T θ + σ (1 - τ ) T ρ where T ρ R 1 0 τ i A i (1 - τ i ) Q ρ ρ 1 - ρ di . That is, T ρ is a weighted average of the sector-specific tax rates, where the weights depend on ρ ; T θ is defined analogously. 20 CHARLES I. JONES (2006). Importantly, the tax wedges get multiplied by the intermediate goods multiplier. We will discuss the effect of these wedges in more detail below. Finally, a key difference relative to the previous result on the symmetric al- location is that the curvature parameter determining the productivity aggregates has changed. For example, ρ 1 ρ replaces the original ρ . Notice that if the domain of ρ is [0 , -∞ ) , the range of ρ 1 ρ is [0 , - 1) : there is less complementarity in determining Q ρ than S ρ . This result can be illustrated with an example. Suppose ρ → -∞ . In this case, the symmetric allocation depends on the smallest of the A i , the pure weak link story. In contrast, the equilibrium allocation depends on the harmonic mean of the (tax adjusted) productivities, since ρ 1 ρ → - 1 . Disasterously low productivity in a single variety is fatal in the symmetric allocation, but not in the equilibrium allocation. Why not? The reason is that the equilibrium allocation is able to strengthen weak links by allocating more resources to activities with low productivity. If the transportation sector has especially low productivity that would otherwise be very costly to the economy, the equilibrium allocation can put extra physical and human capital in that sector to help offset its low productivity and prevent this sector from becoming a bottleneck. Of course, this must be balanced by the desire to give this sector a low amount of resources in an effort to substitute away from transportation on the consumption side. This can be seen in the math: the equilibrium solution for allocating capital is K i K = 1 - τ i 1 - τ bracketleftBigg (1 - σ (1 - τ )) parenleftbigg A i (1 - τ i ) Q θ parenrightbigg θ 1 - θ + σ (1 - τ ) parenleftbigg A i (1 - τ i ) Q ρ parenrightbigg ρ 1 - ρ bracketrightBigg . Another perspective on the solution is gained by returning to a special case we considered earlier. Suppose θ = 1 , ρ → -∞ , and σ = 1 / 2 , and suppose τ i = 0 . In this case, Q θ max A i while Q ρ becomes the harmonic mean of the A i . Total factor productivity is the product of the two. Contrast this with the same example for the symmetric allocation: there, TFP was the product of the arithmetic mean and the minimum. Allocating resources optimally shifts  #### You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 47 pages?

• Spring '14
• Roe,TerryLee
• Economics, Generalized mean, intermediate goods
• • •  